Compare compounds
Pick up to 3 compounds to see protocols, mechanisms, study endpoints and safety findings side by side.
Peptijournal · Retatrutide vs MOTS-c · https://peptijournal.com/compare?c=retatrutide,mots-c · Printed
01Protocol
Retatrutide
- Start
- 2 mg
- Range
- 2–12 mg
- Frequency
- Once weekly
- Cycle
- Ongoing, titrated every 4 weeks
- Vials
- 10 / 20 / 30 mg
- Titration
- Weeks 1–4: 2 mg
- Weeks 5–8: 4 mg
- Weeks 9–12: 8 mg
- Weeks 13+: 12 mg (highest trial arm)
MOTS-c
- Start
- 5 mg
- Range
- 5–10 mg per week
- Frequency
- 1–2× weekly
- Cycle
- 6–8 weeks
- Vials
- 10 / 40 mg
02Quick calculator
Retatrutide
MOTS-c
03Mechanism of action
Retatrutide
Retatrutide (LY3437943) is a single peptide agonist of three receptors: GIP, GLP-1 and glucagon. Adding glucagon-receptor activity is studied for increasing energy expenditure and liver-fat effects on top of the appetite effects of GIP/GLP-1 agonism.
MOTS-c
MOTS-c is a 16-amino-acid peptide encoded in the mitochondrial 12S rRNA gene. In mice it acts mainly on skeletal muscle, inhibiting the folate cycle and purine synthesis, which activates AMPK; under metabolic stress it moves to the nucleus and regulates gene expression.
04Study endpoints
Retatrutide
- Phase 2 obesity trial (338 adults): mean weight change at 48 weeks ranged from −8.7% to −24.2% across arms vs −2.1% with placebo.
- In the highest arm, 83% of participants lost 15% or more of body weight at 48 weeks, vs 2% on placebo.
- Preclinical and early clinical work describes glycaemic and weight effects from combined triple-receptor agonism.
MOTS-c
- In mice, MOTS-c treatment prevented age-dependent and high-fat-diet-induced insulin resistance and diet-induced obesity.
- Plasma levels of MOTS-c decline with age, according to a 2023 review.
05Safety & regulatory findings
Retatrutide
- Investigational: not approved by the FDA or EMA for any indication. Phase 3 trials are ongoing.
- Phase 2 adverse events were mainly gastrointestinal and dose-related; heart-rate increases were also reported.
MOTS-c
- Not approved by the FDA or EMA for any indication; research-grade material is not a medicine.
- A 2023 review notes no effective clinical method of using MOTS-c has been developed; evidence is preclinical.